Essay Contrasting Civil Law And Common Law

IN THE summer of 2013 British royalists were eagerly awaiting the birth of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s first child. If the couple had had a girl instead of bonny Prince George, she would have been the first daughter to be able to accede to the throne ahead of any younger brothers. That is thanks to a law enacted in 2011 that changed the rules of royal succession. The previous law that sons took precedence over older sisters was never written down, but was instead part of English common law, the basis of the country’s legal system. But just what is common law, and how does it differ from the civil-law system used in some other countries?

Common law is a peculiarly English development. Before the Norman conquest, different rules and customs applied in different regions of the country. But after 1066 monarchs began to unite both the country and its laws using the king’s court. Justices created a common law by drawing on customs across the country and rulings by monarchs. These rules developed organically and were rarely written down. By contrast, European rulers drew on Roman law, and in particular a compilation of rules issued by the emperor Justinian in the 6th century that was rediscovered in 11th-century Italy. With the Enlightenment of the 18th century, rulers in various continental countries sought to produce comprehensive legal codes.

Today the difference between common and civil legal traditions lies in the main source of law. Although common-law systems make extensive use of statutes, judicial cases are regarded as the most important source of law, which gives judges an active role in developing rules. For example, the elements needed to prove the crime of murder are contained in case law rather than defined by statute. To ensure consistency, courts abide by precedents set by higher courts examining the same issue. In civil-law systems, by contrast, codes and statutes are designed to cover all eventualities and judges have a more limited role of applying the law to the case in hand. Past judgments are no more than loose guides. When it comes to court cases, judges in civil-law systems tend towards being investigators, while their peers in common-law systems act as arbiters between parties that present their arguments.

Civil-law systems are more widespread than common-law systems: the CIA World Factbook puts the numbers at 150 and 80 countries respectively. Common-law systems are found only in countries that are former English colonies or have been influenced by the Anglo-Saxon tradition, such as Australia, India, Canada and the United States. Legal minds in civil-law jurisdictions like to think that their system is more stable and fairer than common-law systems, because laws are stated explicitly and are easier to discern. But English lawyers take pride in the flexibility of their system, because it can quickly adapt to circumstance without the need for Parliament to enact legislation. In reality, many systems are now a mixture of the two traditions, giving them the best of both legal worlds.

This first two lines of this piece were updated on December 2nd 2015 to change tenses and reflect the birth of Prince George. 

Get our daily newsletter

Upgrade your inbox and get our Daily Dispatch and Editor's Picks.

Common Law Civil Law Essay

CIVIL-LAW AND COMMON LAW TRADITION: A

COMPARATIVE APROACH

Civil law primarily contrasted against common law. The significant

difference is that, historically, common law was developed by

custom whereas civil law was developed by legal principles and the

interpretation of doctrinal writings rather than application of facts to

legal fictions. 'Common-law is extremely decentralized in terms of

the source of law (making place for evolving cultural changes) is

highly centralized in its administration because of the weight of

precedent. On the other hand, the civil-law which is centralized in

its source leaves from for a great deal of ad hoc interpretation.'

(Crump M.W.& Kahalas H. 1975). Therefore the civil-law is by its

nature more capable than the common-law and more adaptable to

changing situations.

The Other distinction between the common law and civil law

systems is that the role of precedent has tended to become less

significant. Common law courts have developed skills in

distinguishing earlier judgments of which they disapprove and civil

law system, precedents have a value. Civil law countries try to

ensure that there is some certainty in the law and the same issue

will be decided in the same way. Civil law tradition prevents its

judges from establishing broad principles of law in the absence of

legislation. But in the common law system there is open possibility

for the same case.

'In civil law countries, legislation is seen as the primary source of

law. Thus, courts base their judgements on the provisions of codes

and statutes, from which solutions in particular cases are to be

derived.' (MacQueenH.L. 2000) By contrast, in the common law

system, cases are the primary sources of law, while statutes are

only seen as incursions into the common law and thus interpreted

narrowly.

Furthermore, separation of powers is differently in civil law and

common law countries. 'Some common law countries, especially the

United States, judge are balancing the power of the other branches

of government.'(Renz,D&John, E.C. 1985). By contrast, in civil law

countries judges are only applying the law. There are, however,

sociological differences. 'Civil law judges are usually trained and

promoted separately from attorneys, whereas common law judges

are usually selected from accomplished and...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

Common Law in Australia Essay

1090 words - 4 pages Common law is the law made by judges when deciding a certain case before the court. The reasoning the judge applies becomes a precedent, to be followed by other lower courts in future matters of similarity. This is the basis for the doctrine of precedent. A precedent is either a binding precedent, the reason for a decision of a higher court that must be followed by a court of lower status in the same hierarchy; or a persuasive precedent, meaning...

Sources of Common Law Essay

4071 words - 16 pages The question requires discussion of the sources of law in the United Kingdom (hereinafter referred to as UK) which comprises of common law, equity, legislation, European Union law and the European Convention on Human Rights. The UK is a stranger to codification of laws, hence it comes as no surprise that the UK does not have a written constitution. The English legal system comprises of two main sources of law. Primary sources of law cover...

Natural Law and Civil Law

963 words - 4 pages Leviathan as bearer of supreme authority and nationals who posses certain inalienable rights. We should draw attention to Hobbes’ reasoning about natural law and civil or positive law. According to Hobbes they both match with scope, form and content. However, natural law, which is impartial, equitable, legitimate, and moral in natural state is not the law itself; it just disposes people to peace, mercy, and obedience. Natural law is the laws that...

Comparison of common law and equity law

2888 words - 12 pages Originally, common law was customary law, folk law, based on precedent. There was of course statutory law -- the king's law -- but common law guided how it was enforced and administered. No real common law exists today, having been entirely codified as statutory law throughout the English-speaking world. There remains, however, what are sometimes termed common law rights.Now and again, a new situation arises where there is no law to...

Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific Law

2135 words - 9 pages Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific LawAmericans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific. America was founded on principles of scientific law. But these principles have now been submerged in today's legal system. What is taught today as law is political law.To understand the difference between a...

Civil procedure law reform

3488 words - 14 pages Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1934578 American Bar Association winter/spring 201111 Mediation and Civil Justice Reform in Hong Kong By Kun Fan Kun Fan is an assistant professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and a member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. She can be reached at kunfan@ cuhk.eduk.hk and thanks Cynthia Lee for her help in conducting research. In response to...

The Civil Law and The Religious Law

1194 words - 5 pages In the world the legal system are based on one of three basic systems. There is Western law which is divided into civil law and common law. Then there is Religious law. Each country has its own unique legal system that they include variations of civil, common and religious law. Some have a combination of all three. Civil Law are based on concepts, categories, and rules derived from Roman law, with some influence of canon law, sometimes largely...

Civil And Divine Law-antigone

986 words - 4 pages The Clash Between Civil and Divine Law      Charles Dickens once said, "The law is an ass." Though at first, it seems harsh and very strange, the deeper meaning is one that is a perfect summary of the Greek tragedy Antigone. The meaning of an "ass," is a stubborn, obstinate, perverse, immovable animal. Throughout Antigone, the characters must deal with the clash between Civil and Divine law....

History and Application of Common Law

1873 words - 7 pages 1a) Common Law, also widely known as Case Law, derived from the old English common law, is largely based on precedents, where judicial decisions were already previously made in similar cases where it is used as reference bases or sources of law. Also, common law is not codified, which generally means there is no comprehensive compilation of legal rules and not written in statues [The common law and civil law traditions, 2010:1]. It is during...

Criminal Conspiracy in Historical Common Law

1371 words - 5 pages Criminal Conspiracy in Historical Common Law The law of conspiracy is considerably more complex and uncertain than it need be because the statutory reform of the area largely contained in Part I of the criminal law Act 1977 was only partial. As a result, there are now two types of conspiracy – statutory conspiracies governed by the 1977 Act, and an important but limited range of common law conspiracies, which were expressly retained by the act,...

The Development of Common Law and Equity

3149 words - 13 pages The Development of Common Law and Equity 1.0 Introduction I have been asked to write a report on the development of common law and equity. Common law refers to the law created by judges that was historically significant but has been since superseded by parliament. It is in parallel with equity which refers to the source of law created by the Lord Chancellor which was designed to supplement the common law...

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *